How similar are designing green buildings and Software Development? The Green Building Brain web app is a great example of this and was discussed in What does Green Building have to do with Software Development? Check out my notes after the break
- Vancouver Convention Centre has largest green roof in Canada, uses ocean water for heat source
- role of recollective.ca (there's another collaborator: vancouver design nerds www.designnerds.ca) - help projects meet environmental standards, green building & sustainable community consulting company
- design nerds did awesome car art at 10th and clark
- What would ultimate green building Web app do:
- find where green buildings w/particular features are located
- reduce redundant research
- feature venues for discussion
- promote sharing of lessons learned
- be open source, be open data as well
This notion is progressive for the building industry:
- most stuff is proprietary, most stuff is promotional, no public info about failures, etc.
- but open source model is compatible with green building segment of industry
Created Open Green Building Society Rails Web Application:
- to remove bias
- to be there for entire industry
- http://greenbuildingbrain.org
- Has a "the brain" i.e. database, map and forums
- always looking for funders of course :-)
- working with cascadia, morrison hershfield, ecotrust, aia, eco-integration, blue camas, light house, etc
- user generated content
- collaborative, wiki
- fun
- open source app you can get from github
- elements of social networking
- use the 'cognitive surplus'
- site went live 2 days ago i.e. June 9, 2009
- fully searchable
- global
- already has REST API e.g. to get buildings in XML, HTML & JSON , can also get KML
Integrated Design Process (IDP)
- innovative for building industry, resembles agile software design
- everybody in design team gets involved very early (not just owner and architect)
- team is also involved AFTERwards to get feedback i.e. info to improve this and future designs
- mullti-disciplinary and collaborative
- participation is unlimited, can offer ideas across, e.g. electrical engineer can offer ideas for interiors
- systems thinking - building is an integrated system NOT a collection of systems e.g. lightshelf combined with radiative heating
- appreciative inquiry - looking at what works well instead of just problem solving
- can use this for anything not just buildings! eg. used it for Open Green Building Society Web app
- IDP has all team/stakeholder meeting like a more structured barcamp
- Charette = 1-3 day workshop = quick delivery of design, originated from french term for wagon or cart where designers had to put designs on moving cart, range in size from < 12 to hundreds
- BIM = building information modeling, BIM Storming done realtime online
- e.g. did 60 blocks in 24 hours by 25 teams and more than 130 people
- BIM is like open source, anybody can jump in and contribute
- reflections - hard to overcome perceived ownership, hard to escape closed meeting, hard to create community if previous decisions are not communicated in a way that people likes or appreciate or expect (e.g. people don't read wiki)
- used lighthouse for bug tracking
- 5 sketches - looked at different approaches for interface, 5 sketches for each, 4 people, 100 sketches; lessons learned: even though has to be done in the small, need to publicize results and processes
- IDP team = 50 people approx. trying to expand
- Q: pros and cons of brain listing - pros: lessons learned, failings show transparency and reputation benefit cons: show bad stuff
- Q:how to encourage lessons learned? A: make it a separate field to encourage it